STEPHANIE O. REIK, APPELLANT,
v.
KARL M. REIK, JR., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-04-06
No. 81-1016
Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.
412 So. 2d 40 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Over the wife’s appeal, the awards of permanent periodic and lump sum alimony and child support, as well as the requirement that the marital home be sold and the proceeds divided, are affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); see, Scott v. Scott, 408 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Gorman v. Gorman, 400 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); compare, Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Duarte v. Duarte, 447 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …t award1 and return the matter to the trial court with directions to order the appellee to make additional payments of support and if necessary, in order to give him assets from which to make said payments, direct the sale of the home. Reik v. Reik, 412 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Scott v. Scott, 408 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Reversed and remanded with directions.2 . Under the final judgment the appellee is required to pay $200.00 per month as child support and rehabilitative alimony of $600.00 per…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw