NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
NILES FIRE BRICK CO.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court holds that the National Labor Relations Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence and grants enforcement of its order.
The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for enforcement of an order against The Niles Fire Brick Company. The issue of jurisdiction had previous…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Enforcement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This case is before the court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order against The Niles Fire Brick Company, respondent, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, U.S.C.Supp. V., Title 29, Sec. 151, et seq., 29 U.S.C.A; § 151 et seq.
The issue of jurisdiction was raised, but that question was decided affirmatively by this court in, National Labor Relations Board v. Niles Fire Brick Co., 6 Cir., 124 F. 2d 366.
We conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368. We think that, having arrived at this conclusion nothing helpful will be achieved by a detailed discussion of the findings. We are content therefore to .follow the practice in Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 312 U.S. 660, 61 S.Ct. 736, 85 L.Ed. 1108, and National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co., 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. -, decided by the Supreme Court February 16, 1942, wherein the order of the Court of Appeals, 7 Cir., 116 F. 2d 350, was reversed by a per curiam opinion with directions to enforce thé order of the Board. See also National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co., et al., 6 Cir., 127 F. 2d 30, decided by this court on April 11, 1942.
An order of enforcement will be entered here.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Empire Worsted Mills, Inc., 129 F.2d 668 (2d Cir. 1942)
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1941)
- Riley v. N.Y. Tr. Co., 315 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1942)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Auto. Maint. Mach. Co., 315 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1942)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Auto. Maint. Mach. Co., 116 F.2d 350 (7th Cir. 1940)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swift & Co., 127 F.2d 30 (6th Cir. 1942)
- Ex parte Burall, 312 U.S. 660 (U.S. 1941)
- Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 312 U.S. 660 (U.S. 1941)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Niles Fire Brick Co., 124 F.2d 366 (6th Cir. 1941)