JOE NATHAN GRIFFIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAUKSCH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from judgments and sentences for robbery, sexual battery and kidnapping. We find no error relating to the judgments of conviction. The trial judge did err by entering an ex parte order some days after sentencing. This order was entitled “Order Retaining Jurisdiction over Defendant for Review of Future Parole Commission Release Order Pursuant to Florida Statute 947.16.” The trial court lost the chance to properly enter this order when it was not done at the time of sentencing, as the statute requires. Knight v. State, 398 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
The judgment and sentence are affirmed but the order retaining jurisdiction is quashed.
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; ORDER QUASHED.
COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carrington Wise v. E.L. Copeland Builders & Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 435 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…was not actually dependent upon the deceased employee and was, therefore, not entitled to benefits. The test has been routinely, and properly, applied in subsequent cases where parents have sought dependency benefits. See Ramer’s Feed Inc. v. Fleig, 414 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Wright v. Commercial Metals Co., 429 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Cone Brothers Contracting v. Rogers, 432 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The inapplicability of the MacDon test to situations in which children claim to be dep…
-
McCRAY v. Plantation, 437 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…might be unaffected by a 15% diminution in monthly income, a person with a total monthly income of $541 would almost certainly be unable to maintain his or her accustomed standard of living following a 15% diminution. In Ramer’s Feed Inc. v. Fleig, 414 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 424 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1982), this court found that a 13% diminution in a mother’s income could support a finding of dependency where the mother’s total income was $821. Appellees argue that appellant’s standard of living…
Authorities Cited
- Knight v. State, 398 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)