EDNA MAE BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-05-25
No. 80-1401
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
414 So. 2d 267 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fuller v. State, 414 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Rosenfeld, 467 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …l Procedure 3.191(a)(1). We disagree and reverse. Once the motion to withdraw the plea was granted, the case was outside the ambit of rule 3.191 and all that was left to do was set the case for trial within a reasonable [*733] time. Wehrle v. State, 414 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Davis v. State, 386 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The failure to file the perjury count was clearly a feature of the negotiated plea. The defendant cannot defeat the state’s opportunity to charge her by negotiating a plea and t…
  • Seaman v. State, 654 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Wehrle v. State, 414 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 424 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1982). HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw