FRANZ ALEXANDER ARANGO, APPELLANT,

v.

ESTHER INGLESIAS ARANGO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Prof'l Planning Servs., Inc. v. Sunshine Staff Leasing, Inc., 695 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …. When venue over one count of a complaint is transferred to another county, the determination whether to transfer venue over the remaining counts is within the discretion of the trial court. Ezell v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 415 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Here, there has been no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in transferring venue over Professional Planning’s tort claim. Rather, the trial court properly recognized that Sunshine’s request for a transfer was prop…
• Gallagher v. Smith, 517 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …interest of justice [*747] and the convenience of the parties and witnesses.” Appellees contend that transfer of the remaining counts along with count IV was proper, and, relying upon Ezell v. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 415 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), state in their answer brief that “where the trial court determines to transfer certain claims to a different county pursuant to a specific venue statute, it has broad discretion to determine whether also to transfer the remaining…

Authorities Cited

• Pujals v. Pujals, 414 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
• Brisco v. Brisco, 355 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)