FRANKLIN FIEDELHOLTZ AND AUDREY FIEDELHOLTZ, APPELLANTS,
v.
JUSTIN BUILDING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
FRANKLIN FIEDELHOLTZ AND AUDREY FIEDELHOLTZ, APPELLANTS,
JUSTIN BUILDING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
415 So. 2d 904
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Elison v. Goodman, 395 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); K/F Development & Investment Corp. v. Williamson Crane & Dozer Corp., 367 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So. 2d 350 (Fla.1979); see Dober v. Worrell, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.H. v. State, 428 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…granted A.H.’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the state’s case, and certainly should have granted such at the close of all the evidence. Failure to do so was error. R.D. v. State, 426 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); T.M. v. State, 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla.3d DCA 1982) and D.M. v. State, 394 So. 2d 520 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). Furthermore, the evidence was insufficient to justify an adjudication of delinquency based upon the premise that A.H. aided and abetted in the commission of a grand theft. J.L.…
-
D.C. v. State, 442 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…(Fla. 3d DCA 1978). See A.M. v. State, 440 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). In addition, mere presence at the scene of a crime is insufficient to establish intent to participate. G.C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). See also T.M. v. State, 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); D.M. v. State, 394 So. 2d 520 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). Reversed.…
Authorities Cited
- Chirogianis v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1981)
- Elison v. Goodman, 395 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- K/F Dev. & Inv. Corp. v. Williamson Crane & Dozer Corp., 367 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)