D.C., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
D.C., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
442 So. 2d 289
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The adjudication of delinquency is reversed upon a holding that the evidence presented at trial was circumstantial and failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Redding v. State, 357 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). See A.M. v. State, 440 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). In addition, mere presence at the scene of a crime is insufficient to establish intent to participate. G.C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). See also T.M. v. State, 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); D.M. v. State, 394 So. 2d 520 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- G. C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Meneses v. State, 394 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- D. M. v. State, 394 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Membery v. Hammac, 357 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Fiedelholtz v. Justin Bldg. Corp., 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- A.M., III v. State, 440 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)