GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

RAYMOND ROMINE, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DONNA ROMINE, AND RAYMOND ROMINE, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Bystrom v. Union Land Invs., Inc., 477 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …ke v. Oceancoast Corp., 417 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 424 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1982); Bystrom v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 416 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 429 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1983); Muss v. Blake, 416 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 424 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1982), and that presumption was not overcome. The trial court’s conclusion that the Property Appraiser’s assessment was not entitled to a presumption of correctness apparently derives from its mistake…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Robbins v. Summit Apts., Ltd., 589 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …o the ruling of the trial court, the presumption of correctness remains with the Property Appraiser for purposes of the de novo proceeding in circuit court, even if the Adjustment Board has ruled in favor of the taxpayer. Id. at 1146; Muss v. Blake, 416 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 424 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1982). For reasons of public policy, the presumption remains with the Property Appraiser and does not shift to the ruling of the Adjustment Board. Bystrom v. Equitable Life, 416 So. 2d at 1146-47.…
• Bystrom v. Bloom, 472 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …rcumstances, not that the property appraiser’s valuation was arbitrary and had no reasonable basis whatever. See Homer v. Dadeland Shopping Center, Inc., 229 So. 2d 834, 838 (Fla.1969); Powell v. Kelly, 223 So. 2d 305, 307 (Fla.1969); Muss v. Blake, 416 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review denied, 424 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1982). Fourth, the trial court was therefore in error in denying the property appraiser’s claim below. Reversed and remanded.…