CAPITAL LINCOLN MERCURY AND SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., APPELLANTS,

v.

SPECIAL DISABILITY TRUST FUND, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• RAY v. State, 480 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …me until the prisoner has served the whole of any minimum mandatory sentences. . Ray makes no claim that he was also led to expect deduction of basic gain time. . There is no automatic right to receive incentive gain time, Dickinson v. Wainwright, 416 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); but the procedures for awarding incentive gain time must be applied uniformly, Pettway v. Wainwright, 450 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).…
• Sherrill Turner v. Singletary, 623 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …6), a petition for writ of mandamus may, in certain instances, be a proper remedy for review of DOC’s denial of gain time. There we further explained: While there is no automatic right to receive day-for-day work gain time, Dickinson v. Wainwright, 416 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the procedures for awarding the gain time must be applied uniformly, Pettway v. Wainwright, 450 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). This court has also held that since its jurisdiction to entertain direct appeals by prisoners from…
• Hall v. Louie L. Wainwright, 498 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …). We disagree with the state’s contention that since the award of gain time is discretionary, a petition for writ of mandamus is an improper remedy. While there is no automatic right to receive day-for-day work gain time, Dickinson v. Wainwright, 416 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the procedures for awarding the gain time must be applied uniformly, Pettway v. Wainwright, 450 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). This court has also held that since its jurisdiction to entertain direct appeals by prisoners from…