SPECIAL DISABILITY TRUST FUND, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MOTOR AND COMPRESSOR COMPANY AND SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The Special Disability Trust Fund seeks to appeal a workers’ compensation order finding that the employer/carrier was entitled to reimbursement for rehabilitation benefits paid on claimant’s behalf, but reserving “jurisdiction for the determination of any further matters related to the issues determined herein.” The order further indicates that the amount of reimbursement will be determined at a later date. Since this order is non-final, in that it fails to dispose of all matters ripe for determination and not stipulated between the parties, we conclude that we are without jurisdiction over this appeal. See Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 7 F.L.W. 1330 (Fla. 1st DCA, Case No. AG-291, June 18, 1982); The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So. 2d 813, (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to review of the order in the event of an appeal from a final order awarding reimbursement.
MILLS, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Special Disability Tr. Fund v. Motor & Compressor Co. & Shelby Mut. Ins. Co., 446 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…n its most recent session to the legislatures which preceded it and enacted the laws this opinion interprets. Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED. ZEHMER, J., concurs. WENTWORTH, J., dissents. . This case previously appeared before us in 417 So. 2d 1151 wherein we dismissed the appeal sua sponte because the order appealed was non-final by reason of the deputy's reservation of jurisdiction for later determination of certain issues. The dismissal was without prejudice to the parties’ right to appeal…
-
Hous. BY Vogue & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Caswell, 421 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…dispose of all matters ripe for determination between the parties, we conclude that we are without jurisdiction to review this portion of the order. See Special Disability Trust Fund, Dept. of Labor & Employment Security v. Motor and Compressor Co., 417 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, this aspect of the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to review any final order that may be entered on this subject. REVERSED in part, DISMISSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this…
-
The Doll House, Inc. v. Porter, 436 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…Beach v. Watts, 426 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); The Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Ray Roofing Co., Inc. v. Young, 419 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Special Disability Trust Fund v. Motor and Compressor Company, 417 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); General Electric Company v. Hawkins, 413 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, be…
Authorities Cited
- The Wash House & S.C. Ins. Co. v. Tucker, 413 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Mills Elec. Contractors & Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Marthens, 417 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)