MARTIAL RONALD LEMAY, APPELLANT,
v.
EILEEN ALZMANN LEMAY, APPELLEE
MARTIAL RONALD LEMAY, APPELLANT,
EILEEN ALZMANN LEMAY, APPELLEE
422 So. 2d 1102
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although we agree with appellant that the trial court improperly labeled its award to appellee of a portion of appellant’s interest in the marital home as a special equity therein, we believe such error was harmless in view of the trial court’s authority to award the appellee lump sum alimony based upon the same equitable considerations upon which the special equity award was made. McCall v. McCall, 386 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). We have also reviewed the other awards made by the trial court and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in all respects.
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peters v. Ojeda, 902 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…e Maddox v. St. Joe Papermakers Fed. Credit Union, 572 So. 2d 961, 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (holding that courts should look to a borrower’s use of the loan proceeds rather than the borrower’s subjective motivation); Chopper v. Nat’l Bank of Detroit, 422 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (holding that the falsity of the business purpose affidavits and the Bank’s knowledge of such falsity presented issues of fact which were inappropriately disposed of on a motion for summary judgment). Plaintiffs argue that summa…
Authorities Cited
- McCALL v. McCALL, 386 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)