FRANCIS C. ARMSTRONG, III, APPELLANT,
v.
JULIE W. ARMSTRONG, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-11-09
No. 82-392
Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.
424 So. 2d 24 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

After a childless twelve-year marriage, the trial judge awarded the appellee, wife, who was 37 years of age, the husband’s half-interest in the marital home (title was in the estate by the entireties) as lump sum alimony. This was the only substantial asset of the parties.

We reverse the award of lump sum alimony and reverse the denial of attorney’s fee to the wife. In all other respects we affirm the action of the trial judge. Upon remand, the trial court should reconsider the question of rehabilitative alimony and fix an award of attorney’s fees to the wife for services rendered in the trial court and for services rendered in this court. Goss v. Goss, 400 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Eagan v. Eagan, 392 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Thomas v. Thomas, 377 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed in part, affirmed in part and remanded with directions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • LaMURA v. State, 424 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
    …PER CURIAM. This is a companion case to Hulsey v. State, 424 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) in which we affirmed a conviction for second degree murder. The appellant, La-Mura, was convicted of manslaughter after a joint trial with Hulsey, the triggerman in the shooting death upon which the homicide charges against Hulse…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw