JACKIE SINGLETARY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-03-22
No. 82-445
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.
428 So. 2d 355 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with burglary and grand theft. He was found guilty by a jury of trespass, as a lesser included offense of burglary. As to the grand theft count, he was found not guilty. He was adjudicated guilty of trespass and sentenced to a one year term of imprisonment.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel’s objection to a police technician’s testimony that the appellant’s fingerprints were obtained from him at the jail. Appellant argues that such statement to the jury deprived him of a fair and impartial trial.

We find no merit in this contention, and affirm. Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Motel 6, Inc. v. Dowling, 595 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …be corrected or otherwise allayed. In our view, the two weeks between the filing of the errata sheets and the trial provided sufficient time to reopen the deposition or to file a motion to suppress. Crescent Equipment Co. v. Peters Machinery Corp., 428 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (trial court reversibly erred in excluding relevant depositions at trial, where the party opposing the depositions had notice that the depositions would be taken before a commissioner four days before the depositions were taken, a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw