RICKY ELLIS PARRISH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fingerprint Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
[*531] SCHWARTZ, Judge.
The appellant, who was convicted of burglary, complains of the trial judge’s action in declining to eliminate the date and place of taking from the fingerprint standard card introduced into evidence. His theory is that since the date was before the offense involved in the trial, and the place of taking was the police department, the information may have improperly led the jury to believe that the defendant had some prior criminal involvement. Since nothing on the card indicated that this was the case, or that the standards had been taken for any reason other than mere non-criminal identification, it is clear that no error, much less harmful error, has been demonstrated on this point. See Jackson v. State, 328 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Henderson v. State, 304 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Jenkins v. State, 208 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 878 (Fla.1968); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1977).
We likewise reject the defendant’s contention that the fingerprint evidence against him was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Roberts v. State, 268 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Therefore, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.J.C. v. State, 400 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…nce that the juvenile’s fingerprints were found on the entry window and on items inside the bedroom of victim’s private residence is sufficient to support the conviction. Roberts v. State, 268 So. 2d 578 (Fla.3d DCA 1972). See also Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). Where the only objection to admission of the fingerprint evidence at trial is on grounds of relevancy, the motion to suppress the fingerprint standards is not properly preserved for appeal. See, e. g., Harkins v. State, 380 So.…
-
Durham v. State, 377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Hamilton v. State of Florida, 356 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 885 (Fla.1978); Sec. 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Marden v. State, 203 So.…
-
Singletary v. State, 428 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…ician’s testimony that the appellant’s fingerprints were obtained from him at the jail. Appellant argues that such statement to the jury deprived him of a fair and impartial trial. We find no merit in this contention, and affirm. Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited. Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roberts v. State, 268 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Lincoln R. Henderson v. State, 304 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Cleveland Larry Jenkins v. State, 208 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Jackson v. State, 328 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Hamilton v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 212 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 1968)
- Cleveland Jenkins v. State, 212 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 1968)