JULIO C. MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-03-22
No. 82-772
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
428 So. 2d 360 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the search of his person was unlawful since it is apparent from this record that there was abundant, although unarticulated, probable cause for the arrest of the appellant. See Thomas v. State, 395 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The trial court therefore properly denied appellant’s motion to suppress.

We have examined the other points raised by the appellant and conclude that no error is demonstrated on this record. See Brown v. State, 423 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and cases cited therein; State v. Fischer, 387 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw