GRACE MARY KAUFMAN A/K/A GRACE DIFABIO A/K/A SANDY JENKINS A/K/A SANDRA JENKINS A/K/A GRACE MARY SIEROSLAWSKI A/K/A MARY GRACE WELCH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GRACE MARY KAUFMAN A/K/A GRACE DIFABIO A/K/A SANDY JENKINS A/K/A SANDRA JENKINS A/K/A GRACE MARY SIEROSLAWSKI A/K/A MARY GRACE WELCH, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
429 So. 2d 841
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The test to be applied in appellate review of denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is whether any rational trier of fact could have found’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Viewing the record evidence most favorably to the conclusion reached by the trier of fact, Douglas v. State, 214 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), and resolving all conflicts in favor of the appellee, see H.D. v. State, 348 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); we find no error. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harrell v. State, 486 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…reci v. State, 399 So. 2d 964 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862, reh’g denied, 458 U.S. 1116, 102 S.Ct. 3500, 73 L.Ed.2d 1378 (1982); Castro v. State, 472 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see also Kaufman v. State, 429 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). (7) And, finally, the trial court did not err in imposing consecutive life sentences. Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences were not imposed in the instant case, and, therefore, Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983), is inap…
-
Coley v. State, 616 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…ther “a rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Melendez v. State, 498 So. 2d 1258, 1261 (Fla.1986) (citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)); accord Kaufman v. State, 429 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 3d DCA1983) (citing Jackson); D.M. v. State, 394 So. 2d 520, 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (citing Jackson). As stated in Jackson, [T]he Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects a defendant in a criminal case against conviction ‘excep…
-
C.L.A. v. State, 478 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…of structure); G.C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (juvenile’s knowledge that crime was going to be committed and mere presence at scene of crime generally insufficient to establish aiding and abetting). See generally Kaufman v. State, 429 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Brown v. State, 391 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979)
- Ira Douglas v. State, 214 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Jefferson v. Smith, 348 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- H. D. AND J. E. W. v. State, 348 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)