CORNELL JOEL GROSSMAN, D.D.S., PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS
CORNELL JOEL GROSSMAN, D.D.S., PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS
289 F.2d 464
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F. 2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bartkus v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1958)
- Caruso v. New York, 355 U.S. 942 (U.S. 1958)
- Grossman v. United States, 355 U.S. 942 (U.S. 1958)
- Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States, 246 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
- Grossman v. United States, 355 U.S. 285 (U.S. 1958)
- Dulles v. Susanne Richter, 246 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1957)