GROSSMAN
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1958-01-06
No. 578
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
355 U.S. 285 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States, 289 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
    …PER CURIAM. The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F. 2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us. Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw