FLORIDA POWER CORP., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Emission limitations imposed on a power plant based on its geographical proximity to a designated wilderness area constitute site-specific conditions that are ineligible for self-executing compliance with subsequently adopted, less stringent emission rules.
[1] A condition in an electric power plant's operating certificate is site-specific and ineligible for self-executing compliance with subsequently adopted less stringent rule…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A site-specific condition, therefore, is a condition peculiar to a certain electric power plant site as opposed to a generalized condition applicable to all power plants.”
The Department's definition of site-specific conditions in its declaratory statement.
Florida Power operated the Crystal River electrical power plant under a 1978 certificate with sulphur dioxide emission limitations derived from the pl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.
Florida Power appeals from a declaratory statement of the Department of Environmental Regulation, §§ 120.565, .68, Fla. Stat. (1981), stating that section 403.-511(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), is inapplicable in stated circumstances. Florida Power is certificated to operate its Crystal River electrical power plant in such a way as to emit sulphur dioxide within certain stated limitations derived at the time of certification, in 1978, from Florida Administrative Code Rule 17-2.04 (1978). The Department now declares that Florida Power may not by self-executing choice operate the plant instead in compliance with new Rule 17-2.500 (1981), which in the circumstances at Crystal River would yield less stringent emission restrictions. Section 403.511(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), permits a certificate holder such a self-executing choice, independent of section 120.57 proceedings in which others may be heard, only if the “rule subsequently adopted by the department ... prescribes criteria more lenient than the criteria required by the terms and conditions in the certification which are not site-specific.”
Because the emission limitations imposed on the Crystal River plant in 1978 were derived in part from its geographical proximity to a wilderness area so classified in the Department’s scheme of things, the Department declared the conditions of its operation as “site-specific” and therefore as ineligible for a self-executing choice by the certificate holder, under section 403.-511(5)(b), to adhere instead to the less stringent restrictions on sulphur dioxide emissions that would be yielded, no other factors intervening, by the new rule. By way of elaborating the statutory term “site-specific,” the Department concluded its discussion of the issue in this way:
A site-specific condition, therefore, is a condition peculiar to a certain electric power plant site as opposed to a generalized condition applicable to all power plants.
We are not concerned with whether the Department’s implementing interpretation of the critical statutory term is the only one possible; nor are we concerned with whether, by our lights, that interpretation is the most desirable one given the statutory scheme as we perceive it. It is enough that the Department’s implementing interpretation is a permissible one, sufficiently expounded by the Department’s declaratory statement. See Department of Administration, et al. v. Nelson, 424 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Florida Commission on Human Relations v. Human Development Center, 413 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Framat Realty, Inc., 407 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 397 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Those prerequisites being met by the declaratory statement, the Department’s action is AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tri-State Sys., Inc. v. Dep't OF Transp., 491 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…d 532, 534 (Fla.1985). Its interpretation of the critical term, here “commercial activity,” does not have to he the only one or the most desirable one; it is enough if it is permissible. Florida Power Corp. v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 431 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Here, the agency’s interpretation was supported by evidence that the zoning codes of two Florida cities relegate broadcast towers to an agricultural rather than an industrial classification. Because there is competent, substan…
-
Little Munyon Island, Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Reg., 492 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…. DER’s interpretation of the critical term “stationary” does not have to be the only one, or even the most desirable. It is enough if it is a permissible one and sufficiently expounded by the declaratory statement. Florida Power Corporation v. DER, 431 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We perceive no error in defining as “stationary” an installation which is designed to, and does, remain in one place in the performance of its intended function. LMI contends that no fill permit can be required for its pro…
-
Bishop Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Belkin, 521 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…It is enough that the Department’s implementing interpretation is a permissible one, sufficiently expounded by the Department’s declaratory statement. (emphasis supplied). Florida Power Corporation v. State, Department of Environmental Regulation, 431 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Also, we find persuasive Sans Souci v. Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums, 421 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), appeal after remand, 448 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), as cited by appellee, wherein this court…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Framat Realty, Inc., 407 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- ABC Liquors v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 397 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- Dep't OF Admin. & Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Nelson, 424 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Fla. Comm'n ON Human Relations v. Human Dev. Ctr., 413 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)