EUGENE MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED SANITATION SERVICES, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, SANITAS SERVICE CORPORATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION FOR PROFIT, GELCO CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Eugene Morris, a professional football player injured in a motor vehicle accident, sued United Sanitation Services for damages. The trial court granted defendant's motion for a new trial on damages only, finding that Morris's lost future earnings claims were unsupported because he voluntarily retired from professional football after the 1976 season rather than being prevented from playing by accident-related injuries.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order granting a new trial on damages only, holding that the trial court's factual findings that Morris voluntarily retired from professional football and that the jury erred in awarding $1,000,000 in lost earnings were supported by the evidence and showed no abuse of discretion.
[1] A new trial on damages only may be granted when the evidence does not support the jury's award of lost earnings.
[2] A plaintiff's refusal to submit to a required physical examination by a professional sports team can preclude recovery for lost future earnings.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the evidence was uncontroverted that the Plaintiff, a professional football player at the time of the accident, reported to training camp with the Miami Dolphins for the 1976 football season subsequent to the accident and passed a required physical examination by the team physician, who found Plaintiff physically capable of playing professional football”
Establishes that Morris was medically cleared to play after the accident, contradicting the theory that accident injuries prevented his continued professional career.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMorris, a professional football player, was injured in a motor vehicle accident with a garbage truck owned by United Sanitation Services in March 1976…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse New Trial On Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order granting United Sanitation Services’s motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only and thus need not reach the issues presented in United’s cross-appeal.
Eugene Morris sued United and others for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident between Morris’s automobile and a garbage truck owned by United. Following a jury trial a verdict was returned establishing liability, apportioning negligence and setting damages. The trial court in its order granting a new trial on the issue of damages only made the following findings:
[T]he evidence was uncontroverted that the Plaintiff, a professional football player at the time of the accident, reported to training camp with the Miami Dolphins for the 1976 football season subsequent to the accident and passed a required physical examination by the team physician, who found Plaintiff physically capable of playing professional football. Thereafter, the Plaintiff was traded to the San Diego Chargers for reasons not connected to the accident of March, 1976, and Plaintiff played football for them during the 1976 season.
It is further undisputed that the Plaintiff simply refused to submit to the required physical examination by the team physician of the San Diego Chargers and elected not to report to their training camp for the 1977 football season or thereafter. The Plaintiff had contracts to play professional football with the National Football League, which contracts had two years remaining (1977 and 1978 seasons) and one option year thereafter. The evidence in toto clearly established that the Plaintiff elected to retire from professional football after the 1976 season and Plaintiff testified that he received deferred compensation during the years 1977 and 1978; which compensation was earned during prior seasons in which Plaintiff played professional football. Thus, this Court erred in permitting the jury to consider lost earnings from Plaintiff’s not playing professional football for the 1977, 1978 and 1979 seasons as a result of the accident of March, 1976.
In conclusion, the evidence will not support damages to the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,000,000 as a result of the accident of March, 1976. ...
The trial court made the requisite factual findings and no abuse of discretion is shown on this record. See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla.1978); Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Fairbanks, 400 So. 2d 550. (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); McInerney Ford, Inc. v. LeMire, 399 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Rivera v. White, 386 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); City of Miami v. Veargis, 311 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pierre-Louis v. Alfred, 573 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…n employment were related to the accident and not merely personal choices not to work. Therefore, based on the evidence presented, there was no rational predicate for the jury’s award of $51,200 in lost wages. See Morris v. United Sanitation Servs., 432 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (evidence did not support damage award in view of fact that trial court improperly permitted jury to consider lost earnings resulting from appellant’s not playing professional football for three years subsequent to automobile acci…
Authorities Cited
- The Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1978)
- Rivera v. White, 386 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y OF the United States v. Fairbanks, 400 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- City OF Miami v. Veargis, 311 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- McINERNEY Ford, Inc. v. LeMIRE, 399 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Am. States Ins. Co. v. Dick's Crane Serv., Inc., 399 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)