PABLO MARALANDA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; GERMAN MORA, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-06-01
Nos. 82-961, 82-987
ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
432 So. 2d 639 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Williams, 400 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Siders v. State, 342 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); and State v. McIntyre, 303 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kronz v. State, 462 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1985)
    …OVERTON, Justice. This is a petition to review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal reported as Kronz v. State, 440 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), in which the district court certified direct conflict with Rehfuss v. State, 432 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and Zulla v. State, 404 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA [*451] 1981). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Petitioner was arrested and held in South Carolina on a fugitive warrant for an escape from a Florida jail. He u…
  • Kronz v. State, 440 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …e a defendant is incarcerated in other states. Although we affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to correct sentence, relying on Kurlin, we certify that Kurlin conflicts with Zulla v. State, 404 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), and Rehfuss v. State, 432 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) on the issue of whether a defendant is entitled to credit on a Florida sentence for time incarcerated in an out-of-state jail pursuant to a Florida detainer or warrant. ERVIN, C.J., and NIMMONS, J., concur.…
  • Buxton v. State, 462 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …of Kurlin v. State, 302 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), and Kronz v. State, 440 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). However, as in Kronz, we certify that our holding conflicts with Zulla v. State, 404 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), and Rehfuss v. State, 432 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Buxton also contends that he was entitled to relief because the trial court, in retaining jurisdiction pursuant to Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979), failed to state, either in writing or in open court, the justificat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw