ROBERT CIABOTTI, APPELLANT,
v.
VINCENT MILO, APPELLEE
ROBERT CIABOTTI, APPELLANT,
VINCENT MILO, APPELLEE
432 So. 2d 792
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. A disputed claim for money damages does not afford a sufficient basis for the grant of injunctive relief. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2494]; Oxford International Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dism. 383 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1980).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Konover Realty Assocs., Ltd. v. Mladen, 511 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…dant’s unrestricted assets3 prior to the entry of judgment. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Leight v. Berkman, 483 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Stading v. Equilease Corp., 471 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. TeleCredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The rule has been specifically applied, as on general principles it must be, to an action like this one for the recovery of unse…
-
Stevenson v. Rutherford, 440 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…d be a factor in support of award of attorney’s fees. They cite Puder v. Raymond International Builders, 424 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). However, as this court pointed out in Angora Enterprises v. Condominium Association of Lakeside Village, Inc., 432 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) appellant’s dismissal of their claim against appellees is not significant to the issue of attorney’s fees. It is clear also that the facts of the present case do not fit the other element appellees cite from Puder — creation of a…
-
Leight v. Berkman, 483 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…may not be granted upon the ground that their preservation is required to satisfy a subsequent money judgment.1 Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Stading v. Equilease Corp., 471 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Oxford Int'l Bank & Tr., Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Harris v. Fla. Dep't OF Labor & Emp. Sec., 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498 (Fla. 1938)
- Supreme Serv. Station Corp. v. Telecredit Serv. Ctr., Inc., 424 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)