MIGUEL ESCOBAR FERNANDEZ AND ENRIGUE EUSBEIO PEREZ, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MIGUEL ESCOBAR FERNANDEZ AND ENRIGUE EUSBEIO PEREZ, APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
434 So. 2d 3
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
Following their convictions for trafficking in cannabis, Section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1981), Fernandez and Perez appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to suppress. Because the record supports the trial court’s finding that Fernandez freely and voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle, the judgments are affirmed.
JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…severance should be granted.” Fox v. State, 543 So. 2d 340, 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accord Vazquez v. State, 419 So. 2d 1088 (Fla.1982); Thomas v. State, 440 So. 2d 581 (Fla.1983); Craft v. State, 441 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Riley v. State, 434 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 434 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We therefore reverse appellant’s conviction for possession of cocaine and remand for new trial. The judgment and sentences are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial c…