BRIAN MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRIAN MILLER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
434 So. 2d 997
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed upon authority of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(b)(1) (1981).
DOWNEY, BERANEK and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Est. OF Jerome Bain v. Gateway Grp., Inc., 605 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…with a developer who was originally introduced as a potential buyer, no sale has occurred where the purchaser was not ready, willing and able to purchase the property, and the broker is not entitled to a commission. Dahdah v. Continent Realty, Inc., 434 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Dahdah does not control the result in this case. Here, the developer has not established that, like the developer in Dah-dah, he was not ready, willing, and able to purchase the property. In fact, the record indicates that at…
-
Mays v. Doyle Hadden, 709 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…Appellee admitted at trial that he and Mays did not discuss a lease management agreement. If appellee wanted a commission upon this eventuality, he, as the draftsman of the contract, should have spelled it out. See Dahdah v. Continent Realty, Inc., 434 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Miller, Cowherd & Kerver, Inc. v. De Montejo, 406 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). See also Crowell v. Investment Realty Center, Inc., 597 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Notwithstanding the appellee’s failure to prove his entit…