THE ESTATE OF JEROME BAIN, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
GATEWAY GROUP, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact remain regarding whether the purchaser was ready, willing, and able.
A broker sued for conspiracy to defraud him of his commission after a property sale resulted in a joint venture instead of a full sale. The trial cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ready, Willing, And Able Purchaser cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Estate of Jerome Bain appeals from an order of final summary judgment in an action for conspiracy to defraud Bain of his broker’s commission. For the following reasons, we reverse.
Jerome Bain contracted with Miller Lake Associates for a commission upon finding a ready, willing, and able purchaser for Miller Lakes’ eighteen acres of property. Although the original offering in this case was for the entire eighteen acres, only seven acres were actually sold to Gateway Group, Inc., resulting in a commission to the broker. The remaining acreage of the tract became the subject of a joint venture between Miller Lake and Gateway, with Miller Lake retaining an ownership interest in the property. Bain claimed a commission on this transaction, and ultimately sued for damages, alleging that Miller Lake and Gateway had conspired to defraud him of his broker’s commission. The trial court entered summary judgment for the partnership.
The trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment, as genuine issues of material fact remain regarding whether Gateway was a ready, willing, and able purchaser. This court has held that when a seller enters into a joint venture with a developer who was originally introduced as a potential buyer, no sale has occurred where the purchaser was not ready, willing and able to purchase the property, and the broker is not entitled to a commission. Dahdah v. Continent Realty, Inc., 434 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Dahdah does not control the result in this case. Here, the developer has not established that, like the developer in Dah-dah, he was not ready, willing, and able to purchase the property. In fact, the record indicates that at times, Gateway represented itself to be the owner of the entire tract, and intended from the beginning to develop the entire eighteen acres. Accordingly, the entry of summary judgment was error. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Est. OF Jerome Bain v. Bibolini, 737 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…dstein, 404 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Hence the judgment below is reversed with directions to order the funds paid to the appellant. . See Estate of Bain v. Morales, 606 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Estate of Bain v. Gateway Group, Inc., 605 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); see also Estate of Bain v. Bibolini, 711 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).…
-
Anne J. Mazzella v. Greene, 802 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…operly interpreted the contract and that the final judgment is supported by competent substantial evidence. Steuart Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 696 So. 2d 376, 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith, 605 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Murphy, 575 So .2d 1347, 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The judgment is affirmed.…
-
Est. OF Jerome Bain v. Bibolini, 711 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…er proceedings consistent with this opinion. . Our disposition of the appeal renders moot the Petition for Constitutional Stay Writ. . See, e.g., Estate of Bain v. Morales, 606 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Estate of Bain v. Gateway Group, Inc., 605 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Miller v. State, 434 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Hutt v. City OF Cape Coral & Aetna Sur. & Cas. Ins. Co., 434 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)