CHARLES C. ANDERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Harley L. Vause v. BAY Med. Ctr., 687 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …ted works” have held that while employees may have different duties as related to the same project, it does not mean they are involved in “unrelated works.” Abraham v. Dzafic, 666 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Johnson v. Comet Steel Erection, Inc., 435 So. 2d 908, 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).2 In Johnson, the court held, Where appellant, an employee of the general contractor, was injured as a result of the ordinary negligence of the subcontractor’s employee while both were employed on-site in the same constructi…
• Taylor v. Sch. Bd. OF Brevard Cnty., 888 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2004)
  …confronted ’with the task of attempting to ascertain the intended workable definition. The Third District was the first to address the issue of the scope of the application of the unrelated works exception. In Johnson v. Comet Steel Erection, Inc., 435 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), the court held, without any expanded explanation, that a common laborer for a general contractor and a welder for a subcontractor, both of whom were employed on-site on the same construction project, were not engaged in unrelated…
• Abraham v. Dzafic, 666 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …her to the same hotel for rest and relaxation. Although one was a painter and the other was a fluorescent lighting technician, and their work skills may have been “unrelated,” their work was not. The holding of Johnson v. Comet Steel Erection, Inc., 435 So. 2d 908, 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), is instructive in this case: Where appellant, an employee of the general contractor, was injured as a result of the ordinary negligence of the subcontractor’s employee while both were employed on-site in the same constructi…