JOSEPH N. MORROW, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JOSEPH N. MORROW, JR., PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
436 So. 2d 243
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In view of the state’s affidavits filed below in this case and in the absence of the state’s concessions as made in Endress v. Coe, 433 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we cannot say that the result reached by the circuit judge herein conflicts with Endress, supra, or otherwise departs from the essen tial requirements of law. Therefore, this petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ross, 447 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…tment for youthful offenders whereas section 397.12’s “[reference to drug abuse program” is discretionary. Third, section 958.05 itself provides for mandatory one year sentences for particularly serious crimes or dangerous offenders. Brown v. State, 436 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Cochran v. State, 410 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Patterson v. State, 408 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Whitlock v. State, 404 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Thus, we hold that section 397.12, Florida Statutes (1981), is no…
Authorities Cited
- Endress v. COE, 433 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)