JOSE TORREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, the portions of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to pay ten dollars pursuant to section 960.20 (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), ten dollars pursuant to section 775.0835 (optional fine for the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), and four dollars pursuant to sections 943.25(4) and 943.25(8) (Law Enforcement Training and Correctional Officer Training Trust Funds), are stricken since the trial court adjudged appellant insolvent prior to trial and appointed the public defender to represent him. Brown v. State, 427 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (question certified).
HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Eugenia Bowen & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)…nt is indigent, there is no threat of imprisonment. 428 So. 2d at 666. We find the decisions of the First District in Griffin v. Griffin, 461 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Smith v. Miller, 451 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); and Ponder v. Ponder, 438 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and the Third District in Robbins v. Robbins, 429 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), to be fully consistent with these holdings. The decision of the Third District in Waskin, however, conflicts with the instant case. The petitioner…
-
Harris Isaacson v. Isaacson, 504 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…ons to have husband adjudged in contempt for failure to meet his support obligations, but she has never been able to show that he had the “present ability to pay” within the meaning of Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985) and Ponder v. Ponder, 438 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (incarceration for civil contempt cannot be imposed absent a finding by the trial court that the contemnor has the present ability to purge himself of contempt). In a continuation of this effort to recover the monies due her, wi…
-
Hoffman v. Kye S. Hoffman, 497 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…empt order, it fails to comply with the requirements of Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985), decided after the court below issued the instant order. The order also fails to comply with the requirements for criminal contempt. Ponder v. Ponder, 438 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The order is REVERSED as it relates to confinement upon filing of an affidavit of noncompliance with the court’s order, but is otherwise AFFIRMED. Future proceedings for contempt should be conducted in light of the cited cases.…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 427 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)