STEVEN WAYNE ELLIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
STEVEN WAYNE ELLIS, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
441 So. 2d 1181
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Harbach, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla.1983); See Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
RYDER, A.C.J., DANAHY, J., and CLARKE, Thomas L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wuornos v. State, 644 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1994)…ing her level of intent and [*1007] whether she had acted in self-defense. This was a proper purpose under the Williams rule. Williams v. State, 621 So. 2d 413 (Fla.1993); Goldstein v. State, 447 So. 2d 903, 906 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Villar v. State, 441 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1984). We also do not agree with Wuornos’ contention that the nature of the similar crimes evidence was so disturbing that its relevance was outweighed by the potential for prejudice. See § 90…
-
State v. Cartwright, 448 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…ermination is to be based upon the totality of the circumstances surrounding the taking of the confession followed by a specific finding on the record as to whether or not it was voluntarily given. Jordan, 334 So. 2d at 589; and see Villar v. State, 441 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We deny rehearing in case number 83-615. We grant rehearing in case number 83-614 and reverse the order suppressing the confession as to the robbery of April 16, 1982, and remand for further proceedings. BERANEK and DELL, JJ.,…
-
McNAMEE v. State, 906 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…violated section 985.207(2), Florida Statutes (2001). However, that section simply requires notification to the parents when a child is in custody. The purpose of the statute is to advise the parents of a juvenile’s whereabouts. See Villar v. State, 441 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Here, both parents knew at all times when the defendant was at the police station. They both had multiple opportunities to speak to the defendant before the first Saturday interview, again before the second Saturday interview,…
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Indomenico v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Enmund v. State, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1983)
- NEW Hampshire Ins. Grp. v. Harbach, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1983)