NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
AMERICAN LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF KENTUCKY, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order, finding the bargaining unit appropriate.
The NLRB found the employer violated the Act by refusing to bargain with a certified representative. The employer did not contest the refusal but argu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse National Labor Relations Act (Nlra) Section 8(A)(5) And (1) Violations cases and more on FLexlaw
The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of its order against American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky, Respondent. The Board found in a Decision and Order reported at 158 NLRB-(No. 31) (1966) that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (5) and (1), by refusing to bargain with the certified bargaining representative of a group of its employees. Respondent does not contest the fact of its refusal to bargain but contends that the unit covered by the certification was inappropriate, and therefore it was under no legal duty to bargain.
The power of this Court' to set aside the Board’s determination of an appropriate bargaining unit is a narrow one, limited to a determination of whether the Board has violated the proscriptions of Section 9(c) (5), 29 U.S.C. § 159(c) (5), by giving controlling weight to the extent of organization or has otherwise abused its discretion. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 F. 2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964), vacated and remanded on other grounds 380 U.S. 525, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265 (1965).
In the instant case the Board found that a grouping of Respondent’s Cleveland 1 and 2 offices, the only offices in the City of Cleveland, was an appropriate bargaining unit. In his decision the Trial Examiner articulated several bases for his ruling. See National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 380 U.S. 438, 443 n. 6, 85 S.Ct. 1061, 13 L.Ed.2d 951 (1965).
We cannot say that the Board gave controlling weight to the extent of union organization or otherwise abused its discretion.
Respondent’s contention that it was denied due process we find to be without substance. It is therefore ordered that the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order be, and it is, hereby granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pac. Sw. Airlines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 587 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir. 1978)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 477 F.2d 969 (6th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 380 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1965)
- Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 330 F.2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964)
- Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 380 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1965)