NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
QUAKER TOOL & DIE, INC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the successor corporation was bound by the prior bargaining order and that enforcement of the Board's order was granted.
The National Labor Relations Board sought enforcement of an order against a successor corporation, Quaker Tool & Die, Inc., which leased a plant from …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse National Labor Relations Act Section 8(a)(5) Violations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order finding 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (5) violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) and (5) (1964), and requiring respondent to bargain with the union, The United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO.
The essential facts in this case are set forth in full in this court’s opinion in NLRB v. Schnell Tool & Die Corp., 359 F. 2d 39 (6th Cir. 1966). In that case this court found serious violations of the National Labor Relations Act committed by the Schnell Tool & Die Corp. before it leased one of its plants to Quaker Tool & Die, Inc., and refused enforcement of those portions of the Board’s order which could only be effective against Quaker Tool because there had been no factual record developed to determine whether or not it was a successor corporation.
In the record now before us such evidence has been developed and the Board found that Quaker Tool was a successor to Schnell and bound by the certification of the union as the bargaining representative for Schnell’s previous employees. See John Wiley & Sons v. Living ston, 376 U.S. 543, 548, 84 S.Ct. 909, 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); Makela Welding, Inc. v. NLRB, 387 F. 2d 40 (6th Cir. 1967). Our review of the record indicates that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. Quaker Tool’s incorporators knew of the NLRB certification of the Steelworkers union at Schnell and of the NLRB decision and order in the Schnell case. The union here has clearly never received either from Schnell or from Quaker the good faith bargaining rights for one year that it was entitled to under settled law. Brooks v. NLRB, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S.Ct. 176, 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); NLRB v. Commerce Co., 328 F. 2d 600 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817, 85 S.Ct. 32, 13 L.Ed.2d 28 (1964); NLRB v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 382 F. 2d 921 (5th Cir. 1967).
Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1964)
- Brooks v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 348 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1954)
- Commerce Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 379 U.S. 817 (U.S. 1964)
- Kemper v. Dayton Bar Ass'n, 379 U.S. 817 (U.S. 1964)
- Makela Welding, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 387 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1967)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co., 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Miami Coca-Cola Botting Co., 382 F.2d 921 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Schnell Tool & DIE Corp. & Salem Stamping & Mfg. Co., Inc., 359 F.2d 39 (6th Cir. 1966)