DEBORAH KIRK EDWARDS AND BILL J. KIRK, APPELLANTS,

v.

YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF LAKELAND, INC., MELVIN LEE VADEN AND WILLIAM HARVEY SMITH, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Pipitone v. Pipitone, 23 So. 3d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …perty settlement and not alimony [for support] it must clearly appear to be so from the final judgment.” Goerlich v. Goerlich, 358 So. 2d 895, 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (citing Brisco v. Brisco, 355 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)); see Witter v. Witter, 443 So. 2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding alimony provision was modifiable support because it did not state spe [*137] cifically that it was part of an exchange of property rights). The lack of evidence suggesting that the payments are in exchange for proper…
• Riley v. Riley, 509 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
  …48 (Fla.1901); Howard v. Howard, 118 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 122 So. 2d 409 (Fla.1960); 26 Fla.Jur.2d "Family Law” § 771; c.f. Lamm v. Chapman, 413 So. 2d 749 (Fla.1982) (child support is a duty, not a debt). . See Witter v. Witter, 443 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Ball v. Ball, 440 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Schminkey v. Schminkey, 400 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). . Solomon v. Solomon, 149 Fla. 174, 5 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1941); English v. Galbreath, 462 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985);…
• COX v. COX, 462 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …g in the record establishing that the payments required in paragraph 13 were anything other than what they were labeled — lump suip alimony. Therefore, contempt is an appropriate means for enforcing the provisions of the paragraph. Witter v. Witter, 443 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Masters v. Masters, 443 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Brisco v. Brisco, 355 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Payments may be a proper form of alimony even though they are to be made to a third party. Stith v. Stith, 384 So. 2d 317…