JULIO A. VALDES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-01-24
No. 82-1241
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
444 So. 2d 534 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Caution
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Williams, 444 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1984).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Watts v. State, 516 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …ubtful” that exceptional circumstances extending speedy trial period could be proved), rev. denied, 431 So. 2d 989 (Fla.1983). But see Wright v. State, 486 So. 2d 651, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (witness’ labor pains were unforeseeable); Valle v. State, 444 So. 2d 534, 535 (Fla. 3d DCA) (witness’ early departure for vacation prior to trial beginning was unforeseeable), rev. denied, 451 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1984); Dedmon v. State, 400 So. 2d 1042, 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (prosecutor not told of witness’ anticipated ab…
  • Hajal v. State, 864 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw