CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-01-31
No. 83-1987
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
444 So. 2d 571 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the motion for summary reversal filed by the appellee, United States Fidelity and Guaranty, as a confession of error and, upon the authority of VanBibber v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 439 So. 2d 880 (Fla.1983); Kaminsky v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 443 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Geller v. Kent Insurance Company, 442 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Randel v. General Insurance Company, 439 So. 2d 986, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), reverse the order under review and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to reinstate the appellee as a party defendant on the appellant’s crossclaim.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Darby v. Sheffer, 458 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
    …culate prejudice under the circumstances of this case. Van Bibber v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co., 439 So. 2d 880 (Fla.1983); Carlson v. Kent Ins. Co., 445 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); City of Miami v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty, 444 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Error was also committed in the course of the trial when the trial judge directed a verdict for appellee on the issue of damages relating to appellant’s alleged lumbar injury and sciatic pain. A review of the record shows there…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw