ALEX WASHINGTON WIGGINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1984-02-29
No. 82-975
GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.
445 So. 2d 1112 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases


Opinion of the Court
SCHEB, Judge.

SCHEB, Judge.

Alex Washington Wiggins was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cannabis and attempted trafficking in cannabis. These are felonies which did not result in the injury or death of another person. Accordingly, we strike the fine of $20 imposed pursuant to section 775.0835, Florida Statutes (1981). Moore v. State, 422 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

We affirm all other fines and costs assessed against Wiggins on the basis of our holding in Easterly v. State, 445 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1984).

We have examined all other points raised by Wiggins and find them to be without merit. Therefore, in all other respects, we affirm his judgment and sentences.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • A.R. v. State, 475 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …s for his defense by the public defender. Section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1983), authorizes the assessment of such costs and fees against an indigent defendant upon compliance with the notice and hearing requirements of the statute. Murph v. State, 445 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Anderson v. State, 415 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record before us reflects that the court did not comply with these requirements. We, accordingly, strike the assessment without prejudice to the fees and costs being assess…
  • Foust v. State, 478 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …le against an indigent defendant only after the defendant has been given adequate notice and an opportunity to object to the assessment. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984); Harris v. State, 452 So. 2d 1041 (Fla.2d DCA 1984); Murph v. State, 445 So. 2d 1112 (Fla.2d DCA 1984). There is nothing in the record which indicates that appellant was given notice and an opportunity to object to the assessment of costs and attorney’s fees under sections 27.56(7) and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1981). Accordingl…
  • Rago v. State, 498 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
    …5(8), Florida Statutes (1985), must be stricken since defendant was not given notice of the assessment or an opportunity to object to it. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984); Foust v. State, 478 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Murph v. State, 445 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). We also find error in the court’s imposition of $200 additional court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Stat [*586] utes (1985) which became effective July 1, 1985. Since the defendant’s crimes were committed on May 24,…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw