JERALD LEROY DAVIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL., RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a district court's dismissal of a civil rights action for failure to effect service was erroneous when the plaintiff was proceeding in forma pauperis.
Appellant, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, appealed the dismissal of his civil rights action. The district court dismissed the action f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certificate Of Probable Cause cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a state prisoner, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action. He challenged the constitutionality of a part of California’s parole revocation procedure pursuant to which his parole was revoked and his sentence re-fixed to life imprisonment.
We reject appellee’s contention that appellant’s appeal is untimely. Although the district court dismissed the action on April 13, 1970, judgment was not entered until July 13, 1970. Within 30 days after entry of judgment, appellant filed a motion for a certificate of probable cause. There is no provision for such a motion in a civil rights case. The motion was denied. He thereafter filed a notice of appeal. We treat the defective motion for a certificate of probable cause as a notice of appeal. That motion clearly indicated appellant’s wish to appeal the dismissal of his case. This court has not insisted upon procedural niceties in the form in which notices of appeal are cast. (E. g., Curtis Gallery & Library, Inc. v. United States (9th Cir. 1967) 388 F. 2d 358; Poe v. Gladden (9th Cir. 1961) 287 F. 2d 249; Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co. (9th Cir. 1958) 274 F. 2d 274, cert. denied (1960) 362 U.S. 919, 80 S.Ct. 671, 4 L.Ed.2d 739.)
Appellant was proceeding in for-ma pauperis. (See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); C.D.Cal.R. 24(b).) The district court’s dismissal of the action for failure of appellant to effect service was erroneous. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c), the officers of the court should have effected service. Potter v. McCall (9th Cir. 1970) 433 F. 2d 1087 establishes the guidelines for the procedural conduct of a civil rights action filed by an incarcerated plaintiff.
The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alley v. Dodge Hotel, 501 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
-
Edwrick Fowler v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1088 (11th Cir. 1990)
-
Rabin v. Cohen, 570 F.2d 864 (9th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Potter v. McCALL, 433 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1970)
- Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser S.S. Co., 274 F.2d 274 (9th Cir. 1958)
- Fitzgerald in Bankruptcy v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., 362 U.S. 919 (U.S. 1960)
- Int'l Terminal Operating Co., Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Co., 362 U.S. 919 (U.S. 1960)
- Dupree POE v. Gladden, 287 F.2d 249 (9th Cir. 1961)
- Curtis Gallery & Library, Inc. v. United States, 388 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1967)