EMITERIO ZUNIGA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-10-02
No. 83-1465
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
456 So. 2d 585 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for manslaughter, aggravated battery (two counts), and use of a firearm during the commission of a felony, see Blair v. State, 406 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1981); McCrae v. State, 395 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1981); Flowers v. State, 351 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Hinton v. State, 347 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), but modify the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences imposed by the trial court to run concurrently each with the other, see Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983); Hernandez v. State, 446 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed as modified.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw