THRESSIA IVEY, APPELLANT,
v.
HULL & COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
LEHAN, Judge.
Notwithstanding the well presented argument on behalf of plaintiff we affirm the trial court’s judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant had furnished to the insurance broker who dealt with plaintiff an insurance application blank containing the name of defendant as “Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries.” Under the facts of this case the broker did not thereby become an agent of defendant or have apparent authority from defendant to issue on behalf of defendant an automobile insurance policy to plaintiff. See AMI Insurance Agency v. Elie, 394 So. 2d 1061, 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
RYDER, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Providence Square Ass'n, Inc. v. Biancardi, 507 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 1987)…Moreover, a condominium purchaser is charged with notice not only of the record documents, but also of the physical configuration of the buildings constituting the condominium. Beach Place Joint Venture v. Beach Place Condominium Association, Inc., 458 So. 2d 439, 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In an equitable action for reformation of a written instrument, the chancellor’s findings of fact are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Though the evidence may be subject to varying interpretations, the chancellor’s…1 / 2
-
Almerico v. RLI Ins. Co., 716 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1998)…re, the appellant is not estopped from rescinding the insurance policy. Since Mr. Pliego was acting as a broker, he was the agent of the Collados in matters connected with the procurement of the umbrella policy. Yates. See also Ivey [v. Hull & Co., 458 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)]; AMI Ins. Agency v. Elie, 394 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Therefore, the conflict in testimony concerning the application was irrelevant because the Collados were bound by his actions. We recognize that the general rule disc…
-
RLI Ins. Co. v. Collado, 678 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…t he had placed coverage with the appellant did not make him appellant’s agent. Yates, 368 So. 2d at 637. The fact that Mr. Pliego was furnished blank applications and expected to receive a commission does not change this result. Ivey v. Hull & Co., 458 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Since Mr. Pliego was acting as a broker, he was the agent of the Collados in matters connected with the procurement of the umbrella policy. Yates. See also Ivey; AMI Ins. Agency v. Elie, 394 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). There…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- AMI Ins. Agency v. Elie, 394 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)