MICHAEL V. COSTELLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1977-05-31
No. 75-2392
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, GEWIN , THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
553 F.2d 506 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The United States Supreme Court reversed the decision of this Court reported at 539 F. 2d 547 (5th Cir. 1976), and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in Costello v. Wainwright, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 1191, 51 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977). The case was taken en bane for consideration of the three-judge court issue. The Court does not regard the remaining issues in the case to be enbancworthy. Therefore, the Court reinstates the panel opinion reported at 525 F. 2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1976) as the decision in this case, and orders that the mandate be issued forthwith.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw