SHIRLEY LESTER, APPELLANT,

v.

J. LANCELOT LESTER, JR., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown Manor, Inc., 647 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 1994)
  …erstanding that they will continue to do business with the plaintiff, or is the plaintiffs recovery of damages limited to harm done to existing business relationships pursuant to which plaintiff has legal rights, as discussed in Landry v. Hornstein, 462 So. 2d 844, 846 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Douglass Fertilizers & Chemical, Inc. v. McClung Landscaping, Inc., 459 So. 2d 335, 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Insurance Field Services, Inc. v. White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc., 384 So. 2d 303, 306 (Fla. 5th D…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Marchesano v. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 506 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1987)
  …This conclusion is supported by substantial competent evidence and, therefore, we will not disturb it. Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 349 So. 2d 1187 (Fla.1977); Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, 176 So. 2d 87 (Fla.1965); Landry v. Hornstein, 462 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). The district court’s extensive analysis concerning the legislature’s apparent purpose in enacting the section 627.727(1) requirements set out above is also correct. Indeed, both legislative intent and logic support the conclusio…
• Hosp. Corp. OF Lake Worth & Hosp. Corp. of Am. v. Raul Romaguera, M.D., 511 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …r with fraud, malice, wantonness or oppression.” Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer. As we see it, the hospital, sub judice, was not activated to do what it did out of malice; in fact it had a legitimate objective in view. See Landry v. Hornstein, 462 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). No fraud is alleged and the methods employed do not appear to have been sufficiently outrageous to reach the level of wantonness that would activate society’s collective outrage. As we said in the original opinion: There are als…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
• Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1983)
• Doyle Edward Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1983)
• Farkas v. Karin Farkas, 452 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)