THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

JOSEPH DAVID FERRIS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Mickel v. Norton, 69 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …e Nortons had a legal right to view the water by looking over the Mickels’ yard, we conclude the fence served a useful purpose by protecting the Mickels’ privacy and keeping trespassers from entering their property. See Calusa Golf, Inc. v. Carlson, 464 So. 2d 1271, 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (finding that an injunction preventing the construction of a fence was inappropriate “even though a spiteful purpose may have partially motivated the construction” where the fence would “serve a useful purpose by protecting…
• Sockolof v. Eden Point N. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 487 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …, 1982, and the vote resulting therefrom, was improper or illegal. [*1115] 5. The expansion of the pool deck and movement of the fence serves useful and beneficial purposes, pretermitting relief in favor of Plaintiffs. Calusa Golf, Inc. v. [Carlson, 464 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)]. 6. MR. & MRS. SOCKOLOFF failed to take prompt action to preserve the status quo and otherwise failed to timely seek judicial relief. Although MR. & MRS. SOCKOLOFF were on notice as early as March 15, 1982 that the fence would b…
• Lizabeth Carlson and Curtis Carlson v. Calusa Golf Inc., 498 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …tivated by spite, the adjacent property owners could not seek to enjoin the construction where the evidence showed that the fence would serve the useful purpose of protecting the golf course from trespass and vandalism. Calusa Golf, Inc. v. Carlson, 464 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So. 2d 673 (Fla.1985). This appeal is from a summary judgment entered for Calusa in appellant’s action for a preliminary injunction, based on a finding that no issue was presented on the material fact that the fence…

Authorities Cited

• Martinez v. State, 368 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1978)