COLEMAN MUSIC AND GAMES AND AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

MARK W. BURTON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Daniels v. Honorable Gilbert A. Smith, 478 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …that this “stacking” of minimum mandatories was improper under Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983). We have previously held that Palmer may be applied retroactively. Cisnero v. State, 458 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See also Moore v. State, 464 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The trial court, denying Daniels’ motion, attached a copy of the plea colloquy. From a review of this transcript, it appears that the offenses in question could have arisen from a single transaction, as that term is employed in…
• Richardson v. State, 500 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …st-conviction relief except as it relates to the issue of stacking mandatory minimum sentences. Contrary to the trial court’s position, Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983), may be applied retroactively to Richardson’s sentences. Moore v. State, 464 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st. DCA 1985). Nonetheless, until just recently, this Court held that Richardson’s argument based on Palmer could only have been addressed on direct appeal and was therefore not cognizable by motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal…
• Anderson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
  …nces for five counts of robbery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983) (courts may not impose consecutive minimum-mandatory sentences when a firearm is used to commit multiple crimes at the same time and place); Moore v. State, 464 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Palmer should be retroactively applied); Bass v. State, 530 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1988) (confirming that Palmer applied to sentences imposed prior to Palmer). AFFIRMED. ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.…

Authorities Cited

• Escarra v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 131 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1961)
• Stacy v. Cherry Farms, Inc., 449 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
• Burnup & Sims Telecom, Inc. v. R.C. White, 449 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)