MICHAEL ANTONIO ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-06-06
No. 1D99-3883
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
761 So. 2d 1162 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In 1985, the trial court would have had jurisdiction to consider and grant appellant’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the improper stacking of his minimum-mandatory sentences for five counts of robbery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983) (courts may not impose consecutive minimum-mandatory sentences when a firearm is used to commit multiple crimes at the same time and place); Moore v. State, 464 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Palmer should be retroactively applied); Bass v. State, 530 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1988) (confirming that Palmer applied to sentences imposed prior to Palmer).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cheaves v. State, 19 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand appellant’s sentence for rescoring with a corrected guidelines scoresheet because the violation of probation in case number 95-524F was not before the court for resentencing. See Cheaves v. State, 761 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (reciting the offenses in case number 95-3271F to be reconsidered for resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000)). The court shall correct the scoresheet by deleting the point value from the “Release Progra…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw