IRENE HELEN AKRIVOS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1985-03-20
No. 84-690
HERSEY, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
464 So. 2d 1355 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The only issue presented for review here is whether the circumstances were sufficient to justify the police officer’s actions in detaining the appellant and requiring her to produce her motor vehicle registration, based upon a “founded suspicion.” We think they were not and reverse, on the authority of Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. Beja, 451 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); State v. Stevens, 354 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

HERSEY, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • West v. State, 503 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …r not to make findings addressed to each of the six criteria. See, e.g., Posey v. State, 501 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Christy v. State, 489 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Cooper v. State, 465 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Upshaw v. State, 464 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, the sentence must be vacated and the case remanded with directions that the trial court resen-tence appellant. If the trial court again decides to sentence appellant as an adult, it should enter a written order whic…
  • Christy v. State, 489 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
    …other listed criteria, we conclude that in the circumstances presented the absence of any reference to appellant’s “sophistication and maturity” as delineated by section 39.-lll(6)(c)4, Florida Statutes, requires resen-tencing. See Upshaw v. State, 464 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Murray v. State, 382 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). The sentences appealed are vacated and the cause remanded. MILLS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.…
  • Michiah Banks v. State, 520 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
    …nks v. State, supra, by the language of section 39.111(6)(d), and by case law requiring consideration of all six criteria. See Christy v. State, 489 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Posey v. State, 501 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Upshaw v. State, 464 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Further, the trial court’s order failed to cite specific reasons for its decision to impose adult sanctions, as required by section 39.-111(6)(d), but instead merely restated four of the factors listed in subsection (6)(c). On r…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw