ARMAND LODEN AND JULIE LODEN, HIS WIFE, FRED O. MCMANUS AND EMILY MCMANUS, HIS WIFE, JAMES GALVIN AND HELEN GALVIN, HIS WIFE, LYLE R. SHARROW AND ESTER M. SHARROW, HIS WIFE, HORRACE SASKIE AND BESSIE SASKIE, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ORVILLE R. CESTER AND BEATRICE L. CESTER, HIS WIFE, WILLIAM J. COFFIN, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES
ARMAND LODEN AND JULIE LODEN, HIS WIFE, FRED O. MCMANUS AND EMILY MCMANUS, HIS WIFE, JAMES GALVIN AND HELEN GALVIN, HIS WIFE, LYLE R. SHARROW AND ESTER M. SHARROW, HIS WIFE, HORRACE SASKIE AND BESSIE SASKIE, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ORVILLE R. CESTER AND BEATRICE L. CESTER, HIS WIFE, WILLIAM J. COFFIN, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES
467 So. 2d 462
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a non-final order. We do not have jurisdiction. National Lake Developments, Inc. v. Lake Tippecanoe Owners Association, Inc., 417 So. 2d 655 (Fla.1982).
We decline to treat the matter as a petition for common law certiorari. Shapiro v. Shapiro, 432 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (fla. 1st DCA 1982); Powell v. Wingard, 402 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979); and Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
Appeal dismissed.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dilar S. Booker v. State, 482 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…per sentencing pursuant to the defendant’s prior selection. We have previously rejected defendant’s second contention that section 921.001(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), violates article X, section 9, of the Florida Constitution. Hayward v. State, 467 So. 2d 462 (Fla.2d DCA 1985). We also find no merit to defendant’s third argument that the court erred in refusing defense counsel’s request to consult with the defendant regarding the accuracy of the scoresheet. Defendant has never pointed to any specific er…
-
Burrell v. State, 483 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…e to their advantage to do so. We have previously held that "loss of the parole privilege ... is not occasioned by an independent act of the state which alone exposes the defendant to an otherwise impermissible ex post facto law.” Hayward v. State, 467 So. 2d 462, 464 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985).…
-
Glover v. State, 474 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…tion of guideline sentencing is affirmatively made (i.e. the guidelines may not be applied to him by default; silence would be taken as not choosing guideline sentencing). As recently noted by the Second District Court of Appeal in Hayward v. State, 467 So. 2d 462, 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985): Although departure from a presumptive sentence in the context of a crime committed prior to October 1, 1983 does disadvantage the defendant through loss of the parole privilege, that loss is not occasioned by an independent…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Lake Developments, Inc. v. Lake Tippecanoe Owners Ass'n, Inc., 417 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1982)
- Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Edwards v. Lawyers Title Guar. Fund, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Wenk v. Tsiotis, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- Am. Cas. Co. OF Reading PA. v. Brim's Food, Inc., 402 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Powell v. Wingard, 402 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Tortoriello v. State, 432 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)