FRANK CLAY GARDNER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida Uniform Traffic Citation is sufficient to charge a violation of Section 316.193, Florida Statutes, for driving under the influence.
[1] Common-law certiorari is generally not appropriate for review of orders that do not determine the ultimate rights of the parties and are not final.
[2] A Florida Uniform Traffic Citation alleging a violation of Section 316.193, Florida Statutes, is a sufficient charging instrument to inform a defendant of the charge of d…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGardner was charged with violating Section 316.193, Florida Statutes (DUI), via a Uniform Traffic Citation. He moved to dismiss, arguing the citation …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Driving Under The Influence cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Judge.
Frank Clay Gardner invoked our certiorari jurisdiction to challenge an order of the Circuit Court of Manatee County which affirmed the county court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the proceeding before it. We deny the petition for certiorari.
Before turning to our resolution of the substantive question before us, however, we emphasize that matters of this kind are generally not appropriate for certiorari review. It is not our purpose to enhance “the possibility of common-law certiorari being used as a vehicle to obtain” two levels of appeal. Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93, 96 (Fla.1983). We write only to eradicate any uncertainty as to the adequacy of Florida’s Uniform Traffic Citation' as the instrument upon which to pursue conduct violative of Section 316.193, Florida Statutes.
Gardner was charged with the violation of Section 316.193, Florida Statutes. The sole charging instrument was a Florida Uniform Traffic Citation on which the deputy had checked, “Driving While Under The Influence of Alcoholic Beverages, Narcotic Drugs, Barbituates, or Stimulants.” Gardner moved to dismiss the county court’s proceeding on the grounds that the charging instrument was fatally defective for failing sufficiently to inform him of the wrong with which he was charged.
The county court correctly denied Gardner’s motion to dismiss. In affirming the county court’s order, the circuit court relied on the decision of our sister court in Layman v. State, 455 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), in which it was held that a “Florida Uniform Traffic Citation or Notice to Appear, alleging a violation of § 316.193, without specification to either subsection (1)(a) or (1)(b) is sufficient to charge a violation of this statute in either of the two ways it can be violated.” We agree with the Layman court and hold that a defendant who is charged in a Florida Uniform Traffic Citation for the violation of Section 316.193, Florida Statutes, is adequately made aware of the infraction for which he or she will be tried.
Petition for Certiorari denied.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ivory v. State, 588 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…ting that section 316.650(3), Florida Statutes, requires deposit of the traffic citation with the court, after which judicial proceedings commence, with the state attorney or his assistant actually prosecuting the charges. See also Gardner v. State, 468 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Layman v. State, 455 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 459 So. 2d 1040 (Fla.1984). We agree with the state that the cited Florida Rules for Traffic Courts evince a clear intent that the uniform traffic citation constitut…
Authorities Cited
- Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1983)
- Layman v. State, 455 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)