NATHANIEL HILL A/K/A NATHANIEL WILCOX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NATHANIEL HILL A/K/A NATHANIEL WILCOX, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
468 So. 2d 406
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand this cause for resentencing with directions that any re-sentencing be in accord with the sentencing guidelines or that separate written findings be entered if the sentence deviates from the guidelines. See Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 1985). The trial court is also cautioned that it is not proper to retain jurisdiction over a sentence imposed pursuant to the guidelines. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Knight v. State, 455 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hill, 492 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1986)…EHRLICH, Justice. We have for review Hill v. State, 468 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) which conflicts with decisions of other district courts on the issue of whether a trial judge is required to set forth in writing the reasons for departure from the presumptive guidelines sentence.* We have jurisdiction. Art. V,…
Authorities Cited
- Knight v. State, 455 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- Hawkins v. State, 463 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)