C.J., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Ellis v. The Honorable Patti Englander Henning, 678 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …stant attorney general in each of the consolidated cases, impermissibly took issue with the accuracy of plaintiffs’ allegations. See Fabber v. Wessel, 604 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 617 So. 2d 322 (Fla.1993); Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). While the responses do not directly controvert the allegations, they do so indirectly by embracing the factual allegations contained in Strax’s response. The responses unmistakably convey the impression that plaintiffs’ allegati…
• Rollins v. Hon. Joseph P. Baker, 683 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …an adversary. This alone is a basis for disqualification. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1978); Mac-Kenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So. 2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Ellis v. Henning, 678 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Judgés are often confronted with the dilemma of whether or not to respond to a show cause order in these types of eases. Perhaps the best course of action is to request the attorney general’s office to file a response on behalf…
• Hill v. The Honorable Richard Y. Feder, 564 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …ace him in the same adversarial position the court condemned in Management Corp. of America, Inc. v. Grossman, 396 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); see also MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So. 2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). In Management Corp., the appellate court held that by attempting to refute charges of partiality, the judge establishes grounds for disqualification. In Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1978), the court stated: Our disqualifi…