CATHERINE PRITCHARD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Stevens v. State, 599 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …uld well determine, as it obviously did, that even the most technical violation of the terms of probation would justify its revocation. See Little v. State, 519 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), review denied, 528 So. 2d 1182 (Fla.1988); May v. State, 472 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Jess v. State, 384 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). It is required, however, that any such deviation be the product of a knowing and willful act by the probationer. Since there was no such evidence below, the order, judgment and s…
• Ranzel Davis v. State, 474 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …as to whether the trial court would have revoked appellant’s probation for the one technical violation and, if so, whether the sentence would be the same. Although failure to file monthly reports is a sufficient ground for revocation, May v. State, 472 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), because we are in doubt, we choose to follow respectable authority 1 remanding for further consideration by the trial court under like circumstances. Accordingly, the cause is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded…
• Donnie Warren v. State, 499 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …obationary conditions as evidenced by his signature on the probation order. See Mobley, 348 So. 2d at 375. Such failure to file monthly reports is a sufficient ground for revocation. Davis v. State, 474 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); May v. State, 472 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). As to condition (9) requiring that he pay $30 per month as a supervisory fee and the special condition requiring the defendant to enter a substance abuse program, we find that these violations must be reversed. The trial court…

Authorities Cited

• Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1974)
• Maisler v. State, 425 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)