CHARLES INGRAM, PETITIONER,
v.
LT. FORTE, COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, ETC., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 4th DCA | 1985-07-31
No. 85-1476
ANSTEAD, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
473 So. 2d 48 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We deny Ingram’s petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to his right to seek redress and remedy under the inmate grievance procedure found in Fla. Admin. Code, Rule 33-3.07. See Morris v. Wainwright, 409 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and Jones v. Wainwright, 298 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Denied.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sutton v. Superintendent Clayton Strickland, Jr., 485 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
    …e affirm the trial court’s actions. See Morris v. Wainwright, 409 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We do so without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek redress under the Inmate Grievance Procedure. Ingram v. Lt. Forte, County Jail Administration, 473 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw